Letter: Determining a just reward for executives

Sir Geoffrey Chandler
Thursday 13 May 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Your leading article 'Golden rewards for boardroom failures' (12 May) rightly castigates the rise of directors' salaries regardless of performance. Your suggestion, however, that a measure of performance should be 'how well a company's share does against those of similar organisations' could well encourage the worst aspects of short-term management.

Over a period of time - which could be years, depending on the nature of the business - relative share price may well indicate the true underlying worth of a business and its future prospects. Short-term profitability, and thus short-term share price, can always be enhanced by the reduction of training or research and development - elements that are vital to the long-term competitiveness and success of a company.

In the short run, the share market tends to be an inefficient measure of anything other than the immediate financial value to the shareholder. If additional criteria were available to it, for example, a quantification of the value of employees and their training as a resource (rather than regarding them simply as a cost), then the market could act more effectively for the good of industry. Indeed, thoughtful business leaders are now grappling with the problem of how the obligation to stakeholders other than shareholders might be measured, recognising the general truth that what business doesn't count it doesn't care for.

You rightly criticise the mechanisms by which such pay rises are given. But it is, of course, the recipients who accept them; and at the end of the day there will be no substitute for leadership and example, essential components of good management, which should temper pay rises of the kind that have understandably provoked criticism. Since the media, in particular the press, view individual business prowess in terms of what is paid rather than what is done, it will be the brave man or woman who is prepared to see a salary significantly below their rivals. But then moral courage, too,

is an essential requisite of good management.

Yours faithfully,

GEOFFREY CHANDLER

London, SE10

13 May

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in