Letter: Descartes, the Pope: epistemologists both

Mr Andrew Belsey
Tuesday 25 October 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Andrew Brown quotes the Pope as saying in his new book that 'Descartes . . . turns his back on metaphysics and concentrates on the philosophy of knowledge' (Faith and Reason, 22 October). This suggests a misunderstanding of Descartes, and of the possibilities of philosophy. Descartes indeed had an epistemology (ie, a theory of knowledge) but above all he was the metaphysician who formulated the notoriously influential framework in terms of which both common sense and science understood the world in the centuries that followed. This was Descartes' famous dualism of nature and mind, the former consisting of law-governed matter in motion, and the latter consisting of spirit or consciousness exempted from deterministic laws.

It is true that Descartes used epistemology as a route into metaphysics, but the Pope's apparent objection to this is misplaced, as any system of metaphysics needs support from a theory of knowledge. The Pope, too, has a theory of knowledge, although philosophically it is a thoroughly disreputable one. Whether correct or not, Descartes' rationalist epistemology is far preferable to the Pope's dogmatic epistemology of revelation and authority.

Yours faithfully, ANDREW BELSEY School of English Studies, Communication and Philosophy University of Wales Cardiff 24 October

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in