Letter: Depressing effect of hospital architecture

Mr Tom Sackville
Sunday 04 October 1992 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Your correspondent (report, 30 September) stated that my criticism of the architecture of a London hospital referred to Guy's. He was mistaken. In fact, he was several miles out.

I specifically did not name any particular hospital; if I had, it would have been unfair on the staff of that hospital to feel that they were being devalued for the shortcomings of the architectural establishment of 20 years ago.

I am sorry that your paper does not have the sensitivity to understand the effects of such journalistic licence on the morale of large numbers of NHS employees.

Yours faithfully,

TOM SACKVILLE

Under-Secretary of State

Department of Health

London, SW1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in