LETTER: Degradation of the Thames

Owen Luder
Sunday 17 September 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Owen Luder

Sir: Short of being asked for our views on possible future uses for Durham Cathedral, I can think of few things quite as degrading to the architectural culture of Great Britain as a West-End estate agent hawking round the Royal Naval College.

Greenwich hosts a collection of some of our most beautiful buildings, designed by some of the most talented architects in history. They were the product of a vibrant cultural and political life.

One simply has to travel along the Thames to appreciate that our political culture now views important buildings as a source of embarrassment rather than pride. County Hall is to be, possibly, a hotel or, possibly, a conference centre or, possibly, an aquarium, or possibly God knows what.

The much-loved Battersea power station, though nothing like as sublime as Greenwich, was to be stripped of its dignity to become a theme park - instead, it has been stripped of its roof to become a monument to the neglect of the public estate.

In these circumstances, it is difficult to feel anything other than cynicism towards a glossy estate agent's brochure purporting to be a canvassing of interest among educational and heritage establishments (one would imagine a neatly typed letter would have served as well).

Architecture has famously been described as being too important to be left to architects. History shows us that the care of government buildings is far too important to be left to politicians. It is the scrutiny of the public, rather than the promise of politicians, that will secure the future of the Royal Naval College.

Yours sincerely,

Owen Luder

President

Royal Institute of British

Architects

London, W1

14 September

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in