Letter: Defaulters face brunt of law
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NICK COHEN reports that courts may be acting unlawfully in jailing 22,000 fine defaulters a year ("Thousands of petty criminals imprisoned 'unlawfully' ", 28 January). This disturbing situation reflects a shameful lack of procedural safeguards.
Whereas most other imprisoned offenders are legally represented in court, jailed defaulters rarely have representation or access to legal aid. Courts must normally consider probation reports when passing custodial sentences - but not when imprisoning fine defaulters. Magistrates must give reasons for other prison sentences in line with specified criteria; there is no requirement in default cases.
Paul Cavadino
Chair, Penal Affairs Consortium, London SW9
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments