Letter: Declassification of secret documents

Marina Sherwood
Friday 17 May 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: While I was in New York recently, a New York Times editorial (20 April) complained about the slow pace of the "review and release of files on covert intelligence operations in the Cold War". President Clinton had apparently instructed the CIA six months previously to "move more swiftly to declassify millions of secret documents", yet the public/researchers still did not have all the papers at their disposal.

I have tried for three years to persuade the Home Office to release surveillance files on colonial anti-imperialistic activists in the UK in the 1930s. It is not even admitted that such files exist, yet it is very clear from existing Colonial Office files and from autobiographies that these men (there were - it seems - no women) were kept under constant watch and their offices were probably bugged. MI5 has categorically refused to release its documents.

The US has not collapsed because its internal surveillance files are routinely released under the Freedom of Information Act; neither has its security service/agents been "compromised". There have been no grave international incidents as a result of the release of secret documents. What were British secret services up to in the 1930s that the Government still fears to allow access to documents?

Marika Sherwood

Honorary Research Fellow

Institute of Commonwealth

Studies

London WC1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in