Letter: Danger reforms now under way
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your report of Michael Howard's proposals to limit the right to jury trial (report, 28 February) makes the erroneous assumption that defendants thereby forced to have their cases heard in magistrates' courts would receive lighter sentences as a result.
This overlooks the power of magistrates in such cases - if they consider their own powers insufficient - to commit the defendant after conviction to the Crown Court for sentencing. It would only be if all "either way" offences were reclassified as summary only, or curbs were placed on magistrates' powers to commit for sentencing, that defendants would be guaranteed a lighter sentence.
At the moment defendants in such cases are offered a "heads we win, tails you lose" proposition, being told that even if they choose trial before magistrates, they can still be sent to the Crown Court for sentence. In these circumstances, it is perhaps remarkable that more than 90 per cent of those given the choice do choose to be tried in the magistrates' courts. This hardly shows that the right to jury trial is being widely abused.
LEE BRIDGES
Principal Research Fellow
Legal Research Institute
University of Warwick
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments