LETTER : Damaging remarks are far from true
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr George Monbiot
Sir: John Watson, who watched our arrival at the Wisley Airfield with "disgust" (letter, 26 April) appears to have viewed our land rights encampment through somewhat discoloured spectacles. We have not, as he asserts, torn down branches of trees and saplings: rather, under the guidance of those of our members with conservation qualifications, we have coppiced several hazel stools for construction poles. To avoid the "trampling of undergrowth and wild flowers", we are keeping to the paths of pallets and wood chips we have laid down.
His views are at variance with those of the other residents who have visited our site, some of whom have brought food and seedlings for us, or have offered to help promote our cause. The farmer promised that if we damaged his land, he would take out an injunction against us. He has done no such thing. On the contrary, our relationship with him has been cordial and constructive.
Our negative impact on the environment is less than that exerted by John Watson every time he flushes his toilet or turns on his lights. The difference, of course, is that our footprint is visible and confined to our surroundings. His is both conveniently out of sight and dispersed all over the earth.
As for our positive impact, I hope to see John Watson joining our litter sweep of the local "beauty spots" this week - some of which are truly disgusting.
Yours sincerely,
GEORGE MONBIOT
Wisley Airfield
Surrey
The writer is a New Leveller.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments