Letter: Damage done by the Arab trade boycott
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Like your correspondent Sarah Helm, I find the plight of the Palestinian businessman Mohamed Yazegi ('Why Seven-Up bottled out of the Gaza franchise', 14 May) both sad and depressing. However, Ms Helm is wrong in her assertion that the Arab trade boycott against Israel came into force in 1967. The boycott was in fact introduced by the Arab League in 1944 when it was aimed at Jewish business and industry in Palestine. It has remained in force ever since.
Although the boycott still aims at damaging business and industry in what is now Israel, it has also done considerable harm to companies that have little to do with the Jewish state. For instance, under the secondary and tertiary boycott regulations, companies that have traded with Israel, or have what the boycott office in Damascus refers to as 'Zionist' connections, are blacklisted.
Fear of such blacklisting has prevented British industry from tendering for business in Israel worth hundreds of millions of pounds - and heaven knows how many jobs. Successive British governments have refused to follow the example of the Americans, the French, the Germans and the Dutch by making compliance with the boycott regulations illegal.
This is despite the fact that the boycott regulations contravene the spirit of free trade and have been criticised not only by supporters of Israel but also by organisations such as the Council for the Advancement of Arab British Understanding.
Yours faithfully,
BERNARD JOSEPHS
Diplomatic Editor
Jewish Chronicle
London, EC4
14 May
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments