Letter: Criminal Justice Act: probation, magistrates' fines, children's testimony

Mr Jim Harding
Friday 02 October 1992 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: While we welcome the introduction of the Criminal Justice Act (report, 1 October), we feel that it does not go far enough. Child witnesses, who may have already suffered terrible abuse, could still be subject to the trauma that the legal system can inflict.

The Act makes provision for a video-recorded interview with a child to be admissible as evidence in court, but children will still have to be available for cross-examination either in open court, or much more likely via a live video link or from behind a screen. The NSPCC has seen many cases collapse as a result of children breaking down in all three situations and demands further action to spare them this ordeal.

We are calling for children to be able to give evidence at a pre-trial hearing in judges' chambers and for that hearing to be video-recorded so that the child will never have to appear in court.

Meanwhile, measures should be taken to: reduce the long delays before a case comes to trial; ensure the availability of video-link facilities in all courtrooms; and to end the use of wigs and gowns by judges and barristers.

Yours sincerely,

JIM HARDING

Director

Children's Services

NSPCC

London, EC1

1 October

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in