Letter: Creative accounting helps EC agriculture
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: On 17 December 1992, the EC agreed a budget for 1993 for the Common Agricultural Policy of 34bn ecu ( pounds 28bn). By mid-January the Commission announced that the figure would need to be increased by about another 1bn ecu ( pounds 830m). This is mainly due to the Council of Minister's decision to maintain the switch-over mechanism, which directly impacts on agricultural expenditure each time a currency realignment takes place.
Every time there has been a devaluation in the EC, whether in Spain, Italy, Portugal, Ireland or the UK, the price of CAP commodities has gone up, because CAP payments are in ecus. Eventually these increases will be reflected in price rises in the shops. So we have people paying more as consumers, then paying more as taxpayers to prop up a defunct system that is running out of control and will lead to an EC budgetary crisis in 1994. So far, 1993 has seen an increase of about 3.9bn ecu ( pounds 3.2bn) over 1992, or 12.5 per cent, in CAP spending.
Rene Steichen, the new Agricultural Commissioner, has admitted the 1994 agricultural basket will not have sufficient financial resources available to it. No doubt the Government will help in some form of creative accounting to ensure the money is available. Why is it that the Government objects to the coal industry or Leyland DAF being helped by public subsidies in times of monetary crisis, but is happy for agriculture to be subsidised to the hilt?
Yours faithfully,
TERRY WYNN
MEP for Merseyside East (Lab)
St Helens, Merseyside
10 February
The writer is European Parliament General Rapporteur for the 1994 budget.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments