Letter: Crazy quota system fails farmers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: How come, of the 25p per litre we provide to farmers for producing milk, nearly half (12p) is spent simply obtaining a piece of paper - the quota - which in itself produces nothing? Why should we be providing a substantial income (12p times 700,000 litres or pounds 84,000) to the lucky owners of the quota that Tim Edwards leases? I strongly suspect that these owners would not normally qualify for social security or means-tested assistance.
No doubt some limited compensation might be justified for getting rid of this artificial right to collect rent or tribute, but we should be seeking to correct this nonsense as soon as possible.
DAVID HARVEY
Tynemouth, Tyne & Wear
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments