Letter: Courts will settle Camelot case
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your article "Camelot TV claims rejected" (22 May) was incorrect, as it implied that the Branson allegation had been dealt with by the Broadcasting Standards Commission. The allegation was not dealt with, as it is the subject of libel proceedings which are still to be heard. Further, you ignored the fact that the BBC did not escape criticism as, in some respects, the Commission agreed that it would have been preferable to have treated the issues differently.
LOUISE WHITE
Head of Public Affairs
Camelot Group
London SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments