LETTER: Courts should decide life tariffs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Paul Cavadino
Sir: Only the courts can ultimately decide whether Lord Donaldson is right in questioning the legality of allowing "public confidence" to affect the length of life sentence prisoners' tariffs ("Law Lord revives row over life for Hindley", 17 January). However, under a system in which government ministers rather than judges make such decisions, there is an inevitable risk that "public confidence" will be equated with considerations of electoral popularity and the volume of media protest. It is deeply disturbing that tariffs could be determined on this basis rather than on the merits of the case.
Setting a life-sentence prisoner's tariff is effectively a sentencing decision. It cannot be right for sentences to be decided by a politician under a private procedure which allows the prisoner no right to a hearing, to be present or represented during the decision-making process, or to appeal. Such a process contravenes the fundamental principles of natural justice.
When life sentences are passed for offences other than murder, tariffs are set by the trial judge and are subject to appeal by either the defence or prosecution. The extension of the same procedure to life sentences passed in murder cases is long overdue.
Yours faithfully,
Paul Cavadino
Chair, Penal Affairs Consortium
London, SW9
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments