Letter: Countryside myth
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.DISTURBED and perplexed by the number of people joining the Countryside March, opponents of hunting are desperately accusing the hunters of hijacking legitimate rural concerns. This is profoundly untrue.
I don't hunt, but I am clear about my own motives for making the long journey from Northumberland to London. Hunting is the cultural tradition of a decent minority group, and the Bill to ban it symbolises the populist bigotry of this government, with its rampant "bannitis".
Many people in rural areas may indeed tell pollsters that they personally dislike hunting. Yet I suspect that, if asked, they would go on to say that they do not wish to impose their views on others. This tolerance of country traditions may be the real difference between rural and urban attitudes to hunting, and it has a broader significance. The fundamental issue is personal freedom.
ALASDAIR MITCHELL
Stocksfield, Northumberland
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments