Letter: Council power

Anthony Samuelson
Tuesday 14 January 1997 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: In your report relating to the petition to the Privy Council ("Campaigner plans to smoke out party's tobacco lobby funding", 10 January), you quote constitutional expert Vernon Bogdanor of Brasenose College, Oxford as saying that a petition to the Privy Council is a waste of time since it is "purely a formal body".

This will come as a surprise to the Privy Council, which has statutory powers enabling the Judicial Committee to consider any matter referred to it by the Queen in Council. In recent times Privy Council inquiries have been held into the legal basis of phone-tapping and events leading up to the Falklands war.

The Judicial Committee was created by Section 4 of the Judicial Committee Act of 1833. Section 21 of the same Act expressly preserves intact the Privy Council's other powers, including what is known as the Royal Prerogative. Thus the right of a subject with a grievance to seek redress by petitioning the Queen in Council has never been abolished.

The "Queen in Council" effectively means the government of the day. The Tories may not want an inquiry into the cash-for-children's-lungs issue, but what about an incoming Labour government?

ANTHONY SAMUELSON

London N20

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in