Letter: Concerned parents defend Stoke Place

Mr,Mrs Michael Dean
Sunday 09 October 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: As concerned parents of a resident at Stoke Place Residential Centre in Buckinghamshire, we feel very strongly that the good side of life at Stoke Place should be put on record.

Our son has been a resident at Stoke Place for five years and we cannot speak too highly of the care given to him there. We have never had any reason to believe other than that he is completely happy, treated well and kept fully occupied each day - not cheap labour, just necessary occupation - and able to enjoy organised social relaxation evenings and weekends.

Whoever made the original allegations obviously has an axe to grind, and it seems to have blown up out of all proportion, but we refuse to believe our son is in any danger: mentally, physically or spiritually.

A great deal of distress has been caused to parents and to the dedicated staff. Our son has a weekend at home each month and we were at Stoke Place last Friday to collect him. The staff there are being crucified by the publicity and by obscene phone calls. It seems utterly unfair, unnecessary and cruel.

Our son, brain-damaged at the age of 12, is one of the lesser handicapped, and we are sure we would know if he had experienced or witnessed anything unforeseen.

Yours sincerely,

MICHAEL DEAN

BRENDA DEAN

Ascot

Berkshire

4 October

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in