Letter: Concern about safety of ro-ro ferries
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Dr Gary Slapper
Sir: The sustained reluctance of the ferry companies and the Department of Transport to act with resolution to ensure vessel safety should be a matter of great concern to all who cross the Channel by sea ("Review of ferry safety urged", 24 July).
The chance of being involved in a cross-Channel ferry collision is much better than that of winning the National Lottery yet, while people on the vessels discount the former risk, many are sufficiently lured by the latter to regularly pin their resources and hopes on it.
It is now incontrovertible that ro-ro ferries without transverse bulkheads or sponsons will sink in minutes if water enters the vehicle deck. Despite repeated warnings about this dangerous deficiency from organisations such as the Royal Institute of Naval Architects since 1985, and avoidable tragedies like those of the Herald of Free Enterprise and the Estonia, most ro-ro ferries do not, even now, have these essential safety features.
The Government has been over-acquiescent in catering to the interests of the ferry operators who are concerned about additional costs during a time of intense commercial competition. Yet more DoT prevarication ("we will have to study the recommendations [of the select committee] when the report is published") is an insult to the safety of passengers.
Yours faithfully,
Gary Slapper
Law School
Staffordshire University
Stoke-on-Trent
24 July
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments