Letter: Compensation laws need to be extended
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I READ with some sympathy of the plight of businesses seriously affected by works in connection with the Jubilee Line extension ('Shop owners find there's no return on Jubilee Line', Business, 17 July).
As your article outlines, the 1965 Compulsory Purchase Act gives a statutory entitlement to compensation where land has been 'injuriously affected' by public works but where no land has been compulsorily acquired. This entitlement has to be considered, however, in conjunction with earlier decisions in the courts which restricted compensation to any diminution in the value of the claimant's interest in the land.
The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors has contended for some time that the legislation should be amended to provide that, if a claimant can show entitlement for injurious affection, he should receive compensation for all losses including loss of profits, and not just for depreciation in the value of the land.
It is impractical to expect that all those affected in some way by works of public development can be compensated. However, there are clearly cases of considerable hardship which are, in our view, capable of being remedied without imposing an undue additional burden on the 'public purse'.
The institution will continue to press for appropriate changes to the current legislation.
A M Chase
Chairman, Compensation Group
The Royal Institution of
Chartered Surveyors
London W1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments