Letter: Commitment essential to reduce emissions
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your report of Michael Howard's speech to the global warming conference ('Petrol prices to continue rising', 8 May) states that the petrol price rises announced in the Budget will lead to 'an estimated 15 per cent saving in carbon dioxide emissions'. This should have read 15 per cent of the 'target' savings.
The really notable aspect of last Friday's conference was Michael Howard's continuing refusal to make any commitments, even in principle, to reducing or even stabilising carbon dioxide emissions beyond the year 2000. Other countries such as Germany have committed themselves to substantial reductions after 2000, and a Labour government would do the same. The Environment Secretary tries to justify this inaction by claiming that the science of global warming is still uncertain.
Yet the report of the International Panel on Climate Change - approved by 370 leading scientists from around the world - leaves little room for argument, and even his own Department's White Paper This Commons Inheritance states that 'there can no longer be serious doubt that the global climate faces significant change because of the accumulation of man-made greenhouse gases'.
If this Government was serious about tackling the greenhouse effect, it would be implementing a national programme of energy efficiency works, such as Labour has recently proposed; introducing mandatory efficiency standards for vehicles and domestic appliances; changing the regulatory regime and tariff structures for gas and electricity; and investing in non-polluting renewable energy sources and in public transport, not endless new roads. Instead, Michael Howard takes refuge behind a spurious scientific smokescreen.
Yours faithfully
CHRIS SMITH
MP for Islington South and Finsbury (Lab)
House of Commons
London, SW1
10 May
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments