Letter: Commission's role
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Amanda Baillieu's eulogium of the Royal Fine Art Commission (3 February) makes two serious errors. The commission did stop the Inland Revenue's design-build scheme at Nottingham, but it did not recommend Michael Hopkins, who is a commissioner. It recommended instead a competition, was asked to comment on the six invited entries and indicated a preference for another entry.
Second, it is true that the City Corporation refuses to submit schemes of its own accord, but the commission has the authority to call in schemes and, like a Select Committee of the House of Commons, to insist on the attendance of all those involved with a particular scheme at one of its meetings. In the case of the City Corporation, its planning department regularly informs the commission of all the more important schemes and the commission then calls them in.
Yours faithfully,
SHERBAN CANTACUZINO
Secretary
The Royal Fine
Art Commission
London, SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments