Letter: Coloureds' lost vote

Mr Christopher Lush
Wednesday 20 April 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I was surprised that Richard Dowden ('Apartheid: made in Britain', 18 April) did not mention the fact that the Coloured vote was guaranteed by the South African constitution.

When the Nationalist government passed an Act to abolish it, in 1951, the case went to the South African Supreme Court and Chief Justice Centlivres ruled that the Act was invalid.

Since they could not amend the constitution, the Nationalists passed the Supreme Court of Parliament Act making Parliament a superior court of appeal. This body duly overruled the Supreme Court and the Act came into force.

Yours sincerely,

CHRISTOPHER LUSH

Travellers' Club

London, SW1

19 April

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in