Letter: Clinton ducks climate issue

Dr David Cromwell
Monday 30 June 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I applaud John Gummer's criticism (article, 28 June) of President Clinton's Earth Summit speech while bemoaning Michael Meacher's conciliatory noises about the "positive" tone of the speech. By not setting targets for reductions in greenhouse gases, Clinton is signalling that he is beholden to American "business as usual" consortia such as the Global Climate Coalition, which includes oil companies.

Although the insurance industry is now raising premiums because of the greater risk of extreme events related to climate change, businesses represented by the GCC and similar consortia are resisting the need to modify their operations. Short-term profit considerations overrule long-term concerns for the planet.

Clinton is also failing miserably in calling upon scientists to devise new technologies to cope with pollution and climate change: a classic case of treating the symptoms while ignoring the underlying disease. By all means, let us properly fund scientific research into the climate system, but at the same time we should reduce our ecological footprint on the only world we have.

Dr DAVID CROMWELL

Southampton Green Party

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in