Letter: Clean image
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your Art Market column (9 July) refers to Guido Reni's David with the Head of Goliath as having been 'so overcleaned that it was raw'. I saw the painting both before, during and after cleaning and would disagree with this most strongly.
While the current close attention being given to conservation is healthy, surely the Independent should have consulted with the National Gallery conservation department before giving credit to such an opinion. Would the National Gallery have given the prominence it did to a painting which had been overcleaned immediately prior to a loan?
In my opinion, the failure of the Reni was in no way due to criticism raised over its cleaning, but to the fact that doubts had been expressed about its attribution; and also because it had appeared on the market in an uncleaned state as recently as 1985.
Yours faithfully,
ANTHONY SPEELMAN
Edward Speelman Ltd
London, W1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments