Letter: Clause for concern
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Giles Radice (29 September) calls upon the Labour Party finally to get rid of Clause IV.
While that may yet prove contentious (albeit less so than in Hugh Gaitskell's day), the least they could do is not to flaunt the quaint old thing. When I renewed my lapsed membership of the Labour Party in June, I was sent a provisional membership certificate whose sole text (apart from typing on my name and my local constituency secretary) consisted of Clause IV in all its glory: 'common ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange', etc.
Needless to say, if I believed in that I would have joined the Socialist Workers Party. Small wonder that Mr Radice's south-eastern C1s and C2s remain mistrustful of Labour, while it sends out such conflicting signals.
Yours etc,
AIDAN FOSTER-CARTER
Leeds
29 September
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments