LETTER: Citizenship an `insurance'

Lin Li
Monday 25 September 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Lin Li

Sir: Being a Hong Kong Chinese who has settled in the United Kingdom, I applaud Chris Patten's suggestion that Hong Kong British Dependent Territories Citizens (BDTCs) should be given right of abode in this country.

The fear of many Conservative politicians that this will lead to a mass influx from Hong Kong and thereby pose a danger to Britain's social stability is unfounded. As recent research has revealed, Britain is not, and probably will not be in the foreseeable future, a popular migration destination for Hong Kong Chinese.

Economically, Hong Kong people feel that they have more opportunities in the Far East than elsewhere. Britain is seen as highly unattractive because of its recent economic depression. Culturally, the overwhelming majority of Hong Kong BDTCs are Chinese, many of whom find British culture alienating. Concern about racial discrimination, considered to be prominent in Britain, particularly as reflected in the debate over the citizenship rights of Hong Kong BDTCs, further reduces Britain's desirability as a place of residence.

Indeed, among the 50,000 heads of household who have been granted British right of abode under the British Nationality Selection Scheme, few intend to move to Britain. Many of them, in fact, have sought, or have even acquired, citizenship status in other countries, such as Canada or Australia; if they had to leave Hong Kong for any political reason, they would rather go to these countries than to the UK.

Although Britain is not a popular migration destination for Hong Kong people, full British citizenship status is nonetheless useful in serving as an "insurance" for them, as it will give Hong Kong people the confidence to stay and work there. This insurance is important for maintaining the stability, and hence prosperity, of the territory.

In view of possible Chinese repression in Hong Kong after July 1997, a British government which ignores the plight of its Hong Kong British subjects is simply being irresponsible.

Yours sincerely,

Lin Li

Glasgow

24 September

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in