Letter: Church taboo on tenderness
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: It is a pity that Cardinal Hume (report, 8 March) did not feel able to go a bit further in his otherwise welcome words about homosexuality. To affirm responsible, non-promiscuous, faithful same-sex relationships, and yet not to allow those involved actually to relate in the deepest sense seems strangely unreal.
The trouble is the whole issue is bedevilled by the obnoxious phrase "genital acts". If, however, we could instead use the word "tenderness", the matter would sound in a different key. "Love between two persons is to be treasured and respected," the Cardinal says, and the tenderness here implied is surely most deeply and sacredly expressed in the physical terms of love.
Why does the Christian church, of all bodies impose a taboo on tenderness?
Yours faithfully,
SIMON PHIPPS
Shipley
West Sussex
11 March
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments