Letter: Choices for electoral change

Professor Gerald Elliott
Wednesday 09 April 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: It is not surprising that the major political parties target their campaigns on the 70,000-odd undecided voters in the marginal constituencies, since under our grossly unfair electoral system these people will determine the outcome of the election.

The current government was elected on 42 per cent of the popular vote, but with a Parliamentary majority sufficient to delay a further election for the full five years. This is a recipe for mediocrity and sleaze. In my university 40 per cent is a "bare pass without honours" mark, and so Britain gets the governments its electoral system dictates, but that its electorate scarcely deserves.

If we reform the electoral system so that MPs are elected as at least the first or second choice of a proper majority of voters in any constituency we might have a better chance of good government. I am a long-time Labour supporter, twice I was a Labour parliamentary candidate, but in this constituency, Oxford West and Abingdon, I must vote tactically for the Lib Dem candidate to have any chance of defeating the Tories, under the current system. This is not an easy decision and invites criticism.

Our electoral system must be reformed by the incoming government, please, to make these Machiavellian machinations unnecessary next time. Maybe we do not need full PR, but we certainly do need a modicum of electoral reform.

Professor GERALD ELLIOTT

Oxford

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in