Letter: Children on trial for adult crimes
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Concerning your story 'Boy defendant makes history at Old Bailey' (2 December) about the 11-year-old boy on trial for manslaughter, said to be the youngest accused, your readers may be interested to learn that in 1900, in British Columbia, where I live, an eight-year-old boy was charged with murder. After a two-day trial before judge and jury, he was acquitted. Although it was clear the boy had shot the victim, the jury evidently applied the then common law rule that, in effect, conferred diminished responsibility upon very young persons.
The boy was hidden from view when seated in the dock (much like the lad at the Old Bailey) but could certainly be heard, for he was allowed to take some toys with him.
He is the youngest person to have been tried in Canada for a capital offence and possibly the youngest in any common law country.
Yours sincerely,
DAVID R. WILLIAMS
Duncan, British Columbia
Canada
4 December
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments