Letter: Children let down by shift in fostering

Pat Verity
Wednesday 20 November 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Kenneth Redgrave's letter on the child victims of failed foster care struck many chords.

Foster care and residential care have indeed been seen as competitors, whereas the National Foster Care Association has always maintained that informed choices should be made for children following proper assessment of their needs. This assessment could be carried out while the child is living at home or in a short-term foster or residential setting, depending on individual circumstances.

We too believe that the time is right for a reappraisal of the services that are offered to children who come into the care of local authorities - and in particular a fresh look should be taken at how those who work with the children are helped and supported.

The majority of children being cared for are still placed with volunteers. Most do a wonderful job, sticking with children no matter what. But if a child-centred service is what is needed, it will necessarily make greater demands of carers; in these circumstances, can they continue to be wholly voluntary?

Isn't it time that we were in a position to require carers not to give up on placements, for the sake of the children? If that is the case, what rewards should they be offered?

We also believe that it is time to look at the role of social workers and family placement workers, to see how they can provide children with a better service. If a child is placed in foster care, one way to help avoid placement breakdown is to give the placement worker responsibility for ensuring that carers are providing a quality service.

Any assessment and improvement of services for children will require adequate resourcing. Without a commitment from central government, the local authorities charged with providing these services will be unable to address what are clearly pressing needs.

PAT VERITY

National Foster Care Association

London SE1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in