Letter: Children can see adult hypocrisy in the education debate

J. Smith
Sunday 04 February 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

JOAN FitzGerald is, of course, right (Letters, 28 January). By definition, there cannot be comprehensive schools where 25 per cent of children are "creamed off" to selective schools. Our preference has always been to choose a comprehensive but Kent had and still has a selection procedure (first the 11-plus and now the Kent tests).

Twenty-four years ago our elder daughter was "selected" and went to the grammar school. Seven years later our younger daughter (just as bright) was "rejected" (it was a "good" year). Our "choice" for her was between one school which had to take her and another which might take her if it had room.

We were urged to fight the decision on the grounds that our second daughter's test results were better than her sister's and since she had obtained 8 O-levels and was doing 3 A-levels, we challenged and eventually won. We think we were right to do so (daughter two is just completing her PhD in genetics at Cambridge University).

Selection, leaving aside the percentage errors in the actual process, is unfair to all children. However careful parents and teachers are, children still consider they "pass" or "fail" and the effect can last a very long time.

Twenty-four years on our granddaughter, bright but dyslexic, awaits her Kent test results. One can only hope that staff and children are not too dispirited to give her the stimulus she will need to achieve her potential.

J Smith

Canterbury, Kent

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in