Letter: Childbirth: heaven at home and hell at the hospital, or vice versa?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: There is nobody so convinced as someone with views about childbirth, and consequently the responses to the report Changing Childbirth have been predictable ('Women to be given control over childbirth' and 'Home truths from hospital', 6 August). Despite good evidence to the contrary, doctors - with a few notable exceptions - have successfully convinced each other, and two generations of women, that birth can only be considered normal in retrospect, that hospital is safer, that electronic foetal monitoring will ensure their baby's safety and that anyone wanting a home birth is foolhardy and selfish.
The so-called childbirth lobby, on the other hand, can sometimes appear to be insisting that everyone should have a home birth and that childbirth is always a wonderful experience. This view invariably provokes a spate of publicity about women (often journalists) who have had difficult births and who have reasons to be grateful to the medical profession and technology. Such articles are often followed by stories of women who had wonderful home births for their second babies, having had horrifying and humiliating experiences in hospital with their first babies. And so the argument continues.
For most women, reality lies between these extremes, but how are they to judge what is right for them rather than what they can expect from the existing system? It is not a simple issue of hospital versus home, and women need detailed, balanced information about all their options.
Enabling women to make informed choices is a complex business. Most doctors will need to re-examine their beliefs and their motivations and assess these against hard evidence. Many midwives will have to reclaim their status as experts in normal childbirth and practitioners in their own right. Health service managers will have to offer an organisational framework in which midwives can respond flexibly to each woman's needs.
Yours faithfully,
JUDITH SCHOTT
London, NW11
7 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments