Letter: Childbirth: heaven at home and hell at the hospital, or vice versa?

Dr C. R. Marsh,Others
Monday 09 August 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: We read with interest, then horror, Maggie Brown's article on choices in childbirth (6 August). As anaesthetists, we agree entirely that, regarding pain relief in labour, 'one of the greatest recent advances has been the spread of the epidural'. We also agree that this procedure does indeed require a highly skilled anaesthetist, and such a service is available in most British obstetric units.

While the procedure is not a 'magic wand' and can have some side-effects, such as failure to achieve 100 per cent pain relief or, rarely, the development of a headache or backache, we were most perturbed to read that 'if the injection goes wrong, it can leave you paralysed'.

To our knowledge, there have been an exceedingly small number of cases of paralysis secondary to epidural anaesthesia, usually from drug contamination or incorrect drug administration. The procedure itself is extremely safe, and we would not like our patients to gain the impression from this article that there is a significant risk of paralysis. This sort of sweeping statement is a very unfortunate piece of reporting, and can only help to pour doubt on an exceedingly valuable technique which has benefited millions of mothers worldwide.

Yours faithfully,

Dr C. R. MARSH, Dr S. P. SMITH, Dr J. DeCOURCY, Dr S. HUGHES

Department of Anaesthesia

Cheltenham General Hospital

Cheltenham

6 August

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in