Letter: Child workers are already doing too much too young

Janet Paraskeva
Sunday 07 November 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

NEAL ASCHERSON's article 'Girls and boys come out to work' (31 October) heralded the possibility that 'child labour may be round the corner'.

It may be closer than he realised. According to the Low Pay Unit (The Hidden Army: Children at Work in the 1990s), 43 per cent of children between the ages of 10 and 16 already have a job - 74 per cent of which are illegal. A quarter of them earn less than pounds 1 an hour, and half work either before 7am or after 7pm. Small wonder that more than a third suffer accidents at work (including cuts, burns and broken bones).

Mr Ascherson doesn't look at what might happen if, instead of children, adults were properly trained and properly paid for their labour, and children provided instead with purposeful leisure and social education programmes through a properly funded youth service. But perhaps that is what he alluded to in his comments about the need for 'another economy' and one that could afford to support its younger generation rather than depending on it for its skimpy existence.

Janet Paraskeva

Director, National Youth Agency

Leicester

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in