Letter: Cherie Blair's warning on poll tax jailing

Mr Colin Farrington
Tuesday 24 January 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Institutions such as ours exist to promote debate and study among professionals for the public benefit. Cherie Booth [Cherie Blair's professional name], a leading barrister in local authority cases, was invited by us to speak at our enforcement conference in Telford last March precisely for this reason, and did a very good job ("MPs back Blair's wife over legal advice", 23 January). She was particularly strong on the dangers involved in local authorities going too quickly to seek committal to prison for people who wilfully and deliberately evaded their local taxes. She gave a clear and authoritative paper on the proper procedures tobe followed.

Like all our speakers at conferences, whether representatives of anti-poll tax unions, bailiffs or others involved in the increasingly difficult and sensitive process of administering and collecting taxes, or making benefit payments associated with them,Ms Booth was paid a fee in recognition of the time taken to prepare her paper and her absence from her London office.

I cannot comment on any individual case in the courts as I have no detailed information; but there is nothing in Ms Booth's presentation for this institute which deserves censure, or indeed (had her husband not been elected leader of the Labour Party some three months later) the slightest comment.

Yours truly, COLIN FARRINGTON Director Institute of Revenues, Rating and Valuation London, WC1

23 January

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in