Letter: Changed customs of musical applause

Mr Martin Shaw
Thursday 03 August 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Martin Shaw

Sir: I sympathise with your correspondent's complaint (letter, 30 July) about the applause after the third movement of Tchaikovsky's Pathetique - maximum impact being best achieved by having only the briefest pause before the start of the desolate finale - but it prompts me to wonder when and why the modern taboo on applause between movements began.

Alice Elgar's diaries contain frequent references to enthusiastic applause (and "curtain calls") between movements of her husband's symphonies. In the time of Hadyn and Mozart, applause was common between and even during movements, in appreciation of some particularly felicitous phrase or virtuoso playing (a tradition continued by traditional jazz bands).

Few of use would wish modern performances to be quite so "authentic". Some music (eg. the first movement of Tchaikovsky's first piano concerto) surely calls for more than the usual shuffling and chorus of bronchial conditions; some demands an appreciative silence. Flexibility would be nice, so that we could show our appreciation or sit quietly, without any accompanying feelings of moral superiority or inferiority.

Yours sincerely,

Martin Shaw

Leicester

1 August

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in