Letter: Change the EMU timetable
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: An opportunity to seize the initiative on EMU is emerging for the new Labour government, based on the likely outcome of the French elections next week (leading article, 27 May). The single currency will struggle to start on schedule on 1 January 1999, following the signal sent out by the French electorate.
Meanwhile, in Germany, public opinion is also moving against measures being taken to meet the deficit requirement for 1 January 1999. Gradual budget adjustment, rather than one-off measures, is vital for sustainable convergence. Both Germany and France have opted for one-offs: the French government in making a shady deal with France Telecom; the German government in opting to revalue its gold reserves.
This new situation offers two possible scenarios for the launch of the euro:
1) A fudged EMU, starting on time on 1 January 1999, in which countries take measures which are unsustainable and which ultimately run into problems with the Stability Pact.
2) Postponement of EMU for up to one year to encourage a softening of the fiscal "run-in" to meet the Maastricht criteria, and at the same time allow the revised fiscal adjustments to combine with firm economic plans aimed at job-creation.
European leaders must revise the EMU timetable. If they don't, there will be a fudged EMU on 1 January 1999 with key member states holding budgetary positions which are unsustainable. An emphasis on employment measures coupled with a smooth run-in to monetary union is better than a rushed and deflationary entry which could all end in tears.
MARK HENDRICK MEP
(Lancashire Central, Lab)
Brussels
The writer is Labour Spokesperson on Economic and Monetary Affairs in Europe
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments