Letter: Caught in the benefits trap
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Hannah Richardson ('Paid to stay in the poverty trap', 22 August provides a valuable insight into the financial dilemmas facing benefits claimants, but is incorrect on two points.
She says that 'the only people profiting from the benefits trap . . . would appear to be London landlords, whose sky-high rents are being guaranteed out of our pockets'.
In my experience (outside London) this is not the case. The local authorities are empowered to restrict the housing benefit paid to people whose rent is 'unreasonably high'. Indeed, they face severe financial penalties for paying benefit in excess of the 'market rent' assessed by the rent officer service. These restrictions mean that many private tenants are forced to make up their housing benefit, to the full level of their rent, out of Income Support payments which are already inadequate.
Ms Richardson goes on to describe the benefits system as having an 'all or nothing approach'. In fact, the poverty trap is more insidious than this, withdrawing support from families and individuals as their earnings increase.
Until this high level of 'marginal taxation' is addressed, Ms Richardson's basic point that 'the benefits system is forcing good workers to turn down good jobs' will remain true.
Yours faithfully,
MIKE BOLTON
Outreach Welfare Rights Officer
Nottingham Hostels
Liaison Group
Nottingham
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments