LETTER:Case for the Child Support Agency
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Tony Ward
Sir: Earl Russell (Letters, 20 October) is having some difficulty in accepting that in 1994/95 the Child Support Agency saved taxpayers pounds 479m that would otherwise have been paid in social security benefits, so I must answer the points he raised.
Included within the pounds 479m is pounds 199m saved in cases where a parent with care promptly withdraws their claim to income support within four weeks of specified agency action, or within eight weeks if the action relates to an investigation into the requirement to co-operate; and pounds 24m saved in cases in which the parent with care ceased to receive income support as a direct result of the agency arranging maintenance.
In claiming these savings, the agency applies an established departmental principle, agreed with the Treasury, that a saving be claimed in all cases identified, as while some that occurred within the four- to eight-week period might not be attributable to the CSA, other savings which are due to the agency's actions, but occurred outside this period, will not be claimed. We believe that this is likely to lead to actual savings being underestimated.
In practice it would, of course, be impossible to establish the real reasons for benefit ceasing in individual cases, as those involved in abuse of the benefit system are hardly going to admit it.
I can also assure Earl Russell, that the agency does not claim a saving in benefit for maintenance that is disregarded in assessing entitlement to Family Credit.
Overall, the CSA is proving to be a very cost-effective operation. During its first three years, if it achieves this year's target, the agency will have collected or arranged more than pounds 500m in maintenance, and will also have saved the taxpayer pounds l.4bn in reduced social security expenditure. This will compare with the total three-year operating costs of running the child maintenance system of around pounds 514m.
Yours faithfully,
Tony Ward
Director of Operations
Child Support Agency
London, SW1
25 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments