Letter: Case for more refuges
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: On Thursday (29 April) the House of Lords debates national funding for women's refuges. Refuges offer a unique form of support and guidance to victims of domestic violence, providing a complete range of services under one roof.
In 1975 the Select Committee on Violence in Marriage recommended the provision of one refuge space per 10,000 head of the population. Today about 30 per cent of that figure, some 284 refuges, exist in England and Wales, many struggling to survive financially, at the whim of cuts to over-stretched local authority budgets.
Abused women and their children who cannot find places in a refuge suffer the traumas of being vulnerable to further abuse, and cost the State huge sums in childcare proceedings, children's homes and social work resources. More refuges, securely and adequately funded, would also greatly reduce expenses incurred by police, courts and the NHS.
The Home Affairs Select Committee published a report in February of this year, which recommended 'that the first priority for government action on domestic violence should be the establishment of a central, co-ordinated policy for refuge provision throughout the country'. The cross-party committee explained that 'this could well be the single greatest cost-saving measure that could be taken'.
We are still waiting for a response from the Government to our report. I do hope that the contributions to today's Lords debate will encourage ministers to implement these long-
overdue measures.
Yours sincerely,
BARBARA ROCHE
MP for Hornsey and
Wood Green (Lab)
House of Commons
London, SW1
27 April
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments