Letter: Care to elaborate, Mr Blair?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your report on Tony Blair's manifesto ('Blair unveils his blueprint of opportunity', 24 June) claims that 'one area in which (he) might have courted controversy is in relation to Northern Ireland'. This would be welcome in this - so far - non-political non-contest.
Blair's manifesto states that Northern Ireland - which is discussed in the context of local, national and regional government for the UK - should be one of the 'highest priorities' of a Labour administration. He then endorses the 1981 conference policy of 'the aim of Irish unity by consent' (probably Labour's last Bennite battlecry) and also backs the Downing Street Declaration.
But there's something of a contradiction here. The joint declaration rules out pre-determined solutions in favour of seeking consent for an agreed Ireland. An agreed Ireland could mean a unitary state, possibly even joint sovereignty (though that is highly unlikely and would inflame Unionist opinion, not win their consent), or the territorial status quo, albeit much reformed.
The declaration also eschews the notion that the British government should join the ranks of the 'persuaders' and seek to convince Unionist opinion of the inevitability of Irish unity. Yet, Labour's policy - as set out back in 1981 - endorses rather than eschews this option.
Blair is absolutely right to support the declaration, but is it not clear that this should involve a reassessment of Labour's 1981 nationalist mantras?
Blair rightly states that 'the conflict in Northern Ireland is the gravest and most protracted problem facing the British and Irish peoples'. But his statements seem to reflect Labour's muddled approach rather than a fresh engagement with the real, not the romantic, Ireland of the past.
Yours faithfully,
AUSTEN MORGAN
London, N8
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments