LETTER: Cannibalism, cookery and kuru victims
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir:Dr Richard Ladle (letter, 26 March) is right to point out similarities between BSE-CJD and kuru, the transmissible brain disease discovered in Papua New Guinea in 1957 which is associated with cannibalism. However, kuru was probably transmitted by a combination of contact with infectious brain tissue and poor hygiene, rather than by eating infected flesh.
In his Nobel Prize-winning lecture, published in full in Science (1977) vol 197, p943, D Carleton Gajdusek showed that kuru was much more prevalent among women than men, that while women participated in the butchery of the corpses men rarely if ever did so, but both sexes ate the flesh after cooking it. Gajdusek noted that women contaminated themselves, their infants and toddlers with heavily infected brain tissue when the skull of a dead victim was opened and, pointing out that they "rarely if ever washed" suggested that infection "was most probably through the cuts and abrasions of the skin, or from nose picking, eye rubbing, or mucosal injury".
If non-oral routes are indeed the principal ones for the transmission of encephalopathies, then one might expect to find the following:
1. Humans would probably not contract anything from eating scrapie-infected meat. For sheep at least, the experience of the last 200 years would seem to support this view.
2. Humans who handle "volatile" scrapie-infected material, such as dry, rendered bone meal made from contaminated sources, could well become infected by inhaling dust. Could this explain CJD in dairy farmers?
3. Humans who handle less dusty material, such as infected nervous tissue in abbatoirs, and who practise sensible hygiene, should be less at risk.
4. Beef from herds which have never been exposed to contaminated meal should not contract BSE, which is true for organic farms.
5. Cows fed on infected bone meal would become infected through the nose rather than the mouth. When cows eat meal they push their entire muzzle well into the food.
Research needs to establish the normal transmission route of these agents before we conclude that eating of, as opposed to non-oral contamination with, infected material is responsible for encephalopathies in humans.
Dr J S Knowland
Department of Biochemistry
University of Oxford
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments