Letter: Call a truce in the sleaze war

Jonathan Youens
Monday 07 April 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Martin Bell's decision to stand at Tatton ("Martin Bell to take the flak in sleaze war against Hamilton", 7 April) is understandable but still flies in the face of the principle of natural justice that a person is innocent until proven guilty.

The best way forward would be for Mr Hamilton to agree to stand aside with both the Liberal Democrats and Labour, and let Martin Bell hold the seat in good faith pending the publication of the "sleaze" report. Then the seat could be contested by all parties fairly and squarely.

JONATHAN YOUENS

Sidcup,

Kent

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in