LETTER:C of E: united but not uniform

Canon John Inge
Saturday 10 February 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Canon John Inge

Sir: Jonathan Glancey (26 January) writes of the Church of England:

How could any architect of any real quality pin down the formal, functional and decorative essence of a church that appears to believe so many contrary things and no longer has a common book of prayer (or, if it does, has largely abandoned it in favour of customer oriented facility versions of the original)?

One might reply that the Church of England "appears" to believe so many contrary things largely because of prejudiced views, such Mr Glancey's, that are propagated in the press. The Church of England is as united now in matters of doctrine and liturgy as it has been in most periods of its history.

What other organisation would be criticised for allowing its members, if they prefer, not to use books written in 17th-century English? The Church of England does have a Book of Common Prayer. It also has an alternative service written in modern English. Both are widely used.

Mr Glancey concludes by telling us that a new C of E Church might as well look like the Pompidou centre as Guildford cathedral. Having berated the Prince of Wales, earlier in his article, for having special preferences in architecture, why impose uniformity of style on the C of E?

Different styles are appropriate to different settings and some need to be avant-garde.

I am privileged to work in one of the most beautiful and awe-inspiring churches in the land. Thank goodness Mr Glancey was not in an influential position when the building of the Octagon of Ely Cathedral was proposed.

Yours faithfully,

John Inge

Ely Cathedral

Ely, Cambridgeshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in