LETTER: By Jupiter, there is no Planet X!

Dr David A. Rothery
Saturday 09 December 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Dr David A. Rothery

Sir: What a pity Tom Wilkie ended his otherwise excellent article on spacecraft that have gone to Jupiter and beyond (8 December) with a paragraph about a "tenth planet beyond the orbit of Pluto" that might have been written years ago.

Few planetary scientists now believe that "Planet X" can exist. The strongest evidence against it comes from observations in recent years of dozens of small icy objects, 200km and smaller in size, that are scattered throughout the region of Pluto's orbit and beyond. This is none other than the Kuiper belt, predicted by the Dutch-American astronomer Gerard Kuiper in 1951 as representing debris from the birth of the solar system, too widely dispersed to have aggregated into planet-size objects.

Extrapolating from the very small areas of sky so far surveyed in detail, it has been suggested that there are probably about 100 million of these more than 10km across. Whatever the total, the very presence of the Kuiper belt is a strong indication that there is no large planet out there.

Yours sincerely,

D. A Rothery

Department of Earth Sciences

The Open University

Milton Keynes

8 December

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in