Letter: Buying a pension

Tony Reardon
Saturday 20 December 1997 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: John Chapman ("The ghost of scandals past", 13 December) asks what his table of ratings for personal pension plans tells us. The answer is: nothing much.

By assuming that all plans have exactly the same rate of growth, he isn't, as he claims, comparing returns at various stages in the life of a pension. All he is doing is comparing charges.

This is like choosing a car not on size, comfort, economy or performance, but purely on price. If you want a Mini-sized pension, then by all means go for the lowest price you can find. But our market research has consistently shown that people care most about the financial security of their pension provider, followed by good, consistent medium- to long-term financial performance and the ability to offer reliable financial advice. Price comes a long way down the list.

He also rather misses the point in his criticism of transfer and paid- up values. Provided they have been well advised, everyone taking out a pension plan will know that they are making a long-term commitment which gives the best value when maintained to maturity.

Many people who do stop contributing to a plan don't have any choice in the matter. Many will have changed jobs and been forced to give up their personal pension for an occupational scheme, because employers who already run occupational pension schemes can refuse to pay into a personal scheme. A change in the law to make personal pensions truly portable by requiring employers to pay in a fair amount would instantly cut the number of people having to take transfer or paid-up values.

Tony Reardon

Pensions Development Director

Allied Dunbar Assurance plc

Swindon,

Wiltshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in