Letter: Burning issue

Ms Madeleine Cobbing
Monday 20 July 1992 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Keith Paterson's letter (17 July) seeks to promote the packaging industry's fallacy that using municipal waste incineration to provide energy will solve our throwaway society's problems.

'Waste-to-energy' incinerators are not a solution. Greenpeace provided evidence to the now defunct Energy Select Committee that waste-to-energy schemes are a waste of energy; recycling of waste can save five times as much energy as waste incineration generates. Waste incineration creates pollution and competes with recycling and reduction of waste.

There is intense public opposition to the proposals for new waste-to-energy incinerators around the UK and people are not in favour of a 'solution' which allows business to continue as usual for the packaging industry while destroying future resources and polluting the environment.

The Government's inclusion of incineration in the Non Fossil Fuel Obligation, will no doubt make incineration even more attractive to the packaging industry (and incineration operators) as it is the electricity consumer who will subsidise the costs of investment in this polluting technology.

Yours faithfully,

MADELEINE COBBING

Toxics Campaigner, Greenpeace

London, N1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in