Letter: Budgets and benefits
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Philip Boyd is quite right that the case for discretion stretches beyond the Child Support Act (Letters, 30 December). May I assure him that I will continue to make the points he suggests about legal aid and the proposed new incapacity benefit?
However, within current social security law, the main vehicle for discretion is the Social Fund. At present, the amount of new money, over and above recycled loans, going into the Social Fund discretionary budget is only pounds 135m. I hope Mr Boyd will join me in campaigning to increase this sum, and I hope he will also recognise that if middle-class fathers hit by the Child Support Act give up their jobs and go on to benefit, there will be less tax revenue available to meet this objective.
Yours sincerely,
RUSSELL
London SW1
30 December
The writer is Liberal Democrat spokesman on social security in the House of Lords.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments