Letter: BSE reveals systemic failure of government

Andrew Puddephatt
Sunday 12 May 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Peter Robb (Letters, May 10) is right - the BSE crisis has highlighted the responsibility of government to manage risk, and to ensure that it has accurate information to help it do this. However, the Government fails to ensure the independence of its advisory committees. The Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee does not meet in public. It is under no obligation to publish its advice, nor to put an annual report before Parliament. The public have no rights of access to the agendas, research papers or minutes of this committee. Nor are there registers of members interests for this and other committees relating to the food industry, which would enable us to see whether the committee had been "captured" by vested interests. Scientists who dissent from the prevailing view are simply not appointed.

In these circumstances how can we have any confidence that the advice which the Government is given is broad enough to allow them to manage risks on our behalf? We urgently need a new body of public law. A possible model is the post-war "access laws" in the United States. These laws are designed to prevent the capture of government agencies by organised interests, to require balance in their membership, to give the public right of access to meetings and documents and to provide safeguards against conflicts of interest. Such laws would, of course, include a Freedom of Information Act.

The BSE crisis illustrates not just a specific failure by a government but a systemic failure. Unless radical reforms are introduced that provide a proper framework of accountability, more such disasters are inevitable.

Andrew Puddephatt

Director, Charter 88

London EC1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in