Letter: Britain's 'two nations' revisited

Sir Frederic Bennett
Wednesday 16 April 1997 00:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The Secretary of State for Wales, William Hague, expressing his total opposition last week even to a review of our present electoral system, went so far as to claim that those countries which had adopted any proportionally representative voting system were provenly weak and unstable. He picked, as one would expect, on Italy. He failed to mention those in Europe which had adopted some other form of voting than "first past the post", including Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Germany, France, Belgium, Holland, Spain and Portugal; and further afield Australia, New Zealand, Japan and others. Are all these unstable societies?

Surely the Tory party leadership should already have taken account of the facts, apparent from recent by-election results and opinion polls, that there are scores of constituencies throughout Britain where the third party in voting terms is Liberal Democrat, but with little or no chance of winning; that tactical voting, especially among the young, is on the increase; and that New Labour has reasserted its pledge to have a referendum about electoral reform during the lifetime of the next parliament.

In 1951 Winston Churchill declared that unless the unfair electoral system were changed there would be dire future consequences for the Tories. If these long-hatched chickens are now coming home to roost, who is to blame?

Sir FREDERIC BENNETT

Aberangell, Gwynedd

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in